CopyGrade
← Guides
Due diligence

CopyGrade vs Polycopy: a diligence layer and an execution bot are different tools

Updated August 26, 2026 · By Simon Lee — CopyGrade Research

CopyGrade and Polycopy are not competitors, and choosing between them is the wrong question: Polycopy is an execution bot — it mirrors a Polymarket wallet's trades into your account, manually on a free tier or automatically for $30/month, with a flat 0.5% fee on any trade it executes — while CopyGrade is an analysis layer that grades whether a wallet is worth copying at all and never executes, holds, or custodies anything. If you copy on Polymarket you may well use both: CopyGrade to decide who, and a bot such as Polycopy to do the copying. This page exists because the two get confused — Polycopy publishes a trader signal called "Copy Score", which is not the CopyGrade Score — and the names are close enough that a search for one can return the other.

Every Polycopy fact below was read from polycopy.app on 2026-08-26 and is quoted where the wording matters. CopyGrade has no affiliation with, and takes no referral fee from, Polycopy or any other bot; see how CopyGrade stays independent.

What does each product actually do?

CopyGradePolycopy
JobGrades a wallet's copyability — a 0–100 CopyGrade Score, five sub-scores, and a vetoing farming-risk check — before you commit capitalMirrors a wallet's Polymarket trades into your account: manual copying on the free tier, "Auto Copy Bots" on Premium
Executes trades?Never. Analysis-only; no execution control on any screenYes — that is the product
CustodyHolds nothing; you never connect a wallet"Non-custodial execution. Your keys, your capital." (its site); it says you can disconnect your wallet anytime
PriceEvery score is free; Pro is $15/month for alerts, screens, baskets, CSV and deliveryFree tier (manual copying, Copy Score access); Premium $30/month with a 7-day trial; a flat 0.5% fee on real executed trades
Its trader metricCopyGrade Score — a 0–100 grade from edge authenticity, risk-adjusted return, drawdown resilience, consistency and a farming veto, graded against forward outcomes in public"Copy Score" — in its own words "a free trader signal, not a per-trade grade", "a free trader-level veto after copy costs (not a ranking)", shown as "a signed whole number like +6 or -4"
Who it ranksThe graded leaderboard and the best-traders shortlist rank by CopyGrade Score with the farming veto appliedIts leaderboard: "500K+ Polymarket traders ranked live by verified P&L, ROI, and win rate", with a 30-day window as one of the filters

Is Polycopy's "Copy Score" the same as the CopyGrade Score?

No. They share a word and a purpose — steering you away from wallets that are hard to copy — and nothing else. Polycopy describes its Copy Score as a trader-level veto after copy costs and explicitly "not a ranking" — its own guidance is "Do not sort a list of strangers by the number and call the top row the best to copy." The CopyGrade Score is a full grade: five weighted factors built from a wallet's complete public trade history, a farming-risk check that can cap the score outright, a realistic post-fee return estimate, and a published track record that includes our own null result. Neither number is derived from the other, and a wallet's reading on one says nothing about its reading on the other.

Which one do I need?

What does neither product do?

Neither guarantees a copied return. Polycopy's own framing — a veto after copy costs rather than a pick — and CopyGrade's live Copyability Index point the same way: only a small share of graded Polymarket wallets currently clears a copyable bar, and a bot faithfully mirroring a wallet with no post-fee edge faithfully mirrors the loss. Before any bot touches your capital, read what a copied gain actually costs and when to stop copying.

Why does CopyGrade not just execute copies too?

Because the fee model would then pay CopyGrade to call every wallet copyable. A flat subscription with no execution, no performance fee and no custody is the alignment guarantee — the reasoning is on the trust page, and the custody trap post explains why keeping the analysis layer separate from the keys is also the safer architecture for you.

Read the methodology← All guides